Usually, the "place to which" is made the object of a preposition, but in the cases of cities, towns and small islands, of domus and of rus the accusative case is used alone: Veronam venis? = "Are you coming to Verona?" How small does the small island have to be? We have a similar, but more limited rule, in English. The accusative of place to which is a vestige of the original meaning of the accusative case. Here, eo is still an intransitive verb meaning "I go" and Romam is still the "end of motion" (not the direct object). Such an expression developed in Latin to mean "I seek Rome" and a verb originally intransitive ("I fly, move swiftly") became transitive ("I seek."). We know this in part because the Greek word, petomai, is related and it means "I fly." If I "move swiftly and eagerly" and the end of my motion is "Rome", then I can say peto Romam. Another example from the classical world: the Latin peto originally meant "I fly" and referred to swift, eager movement. Take an example: "I'm gonna hit your face." Here, "your face" is the end or the ultimate goal of my hitting and so it goes into the accusative case. It is believed that the accusative case originally had a "local" function it was the case that indicated the end or ultimate goal of an action or movement. In English we do not have an accusative case as such rather, we have the accusative function of the Object Case. English: whom, him) in the masculine and feminine plural, it always ends in -s and in the neuter plural, it always ends in -a. In the masculine and feminine singular it always ends in -m (cp. The accusative case is used for the direct object of transitive verbs, for the internal object (mostly of intransitive verbs), for the subject of a subordinate infinitive (that is, not as the subject of the historical infinitive), to indicate place to which, extent or duration, and for the object of certain prepositions.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |